Showing posts with label Borussia Dortmund. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Borussia Dortmund. Show all posts

Thursday, 4 June 2015

Bundesliga 2014/15: Klopp's finale and who deserved relegation

I’ve dipped in to the Bundesliga a couple of times this season, mostly, it has to be admitted, to gawp at the goings-on at Dortmund.
But I also spent a bit of time actually watching the Bundesliga too this season and it was just about the only one of the five major European leagues to have any real form of race on the last day of the season.

Position Team Played Won Drawn Lost Goals For Goals Against Goal Difference Points
1 Bayern Munich 34 25 4 5 80 18 62 79
2 Wolfsburg 34 20 9 5 72 38 34 69
3 M'gladbach 34 19 9 6 53 26 27 66
4 Leverkusen 34 17 10 7 62 37 25 61
5 Augsburg 34 15 4 15 43 43 0 49
6 Schalke 04 34 13 9 12 42 40 2 48
7 Dortmund 34 13 7 14 47 42 5 46
8 Hoffenheim 34 12 8 14 49 55 -6 44
9 Ein Frankfurt 34 11 10 13 56 62 -6 43
10 Werder Bremen 34 11 10 13 50 65 -15 43
11 Mainz 34 9 13 12 45 47 -2 40
12 FC Koln 34 9 13 12 34 40 -6 40
13 Hannover 34 9 10 15 40 56 -16 37
14 Stuttgart 34 9 9 16 42 60 -18 36
15 Hertha 34 9 8 17 36 52 -16 35
16 Hamburg 34 9 8 17 25 50 -25 35
17 Freiburg 34 7 13 14 36 47 -11 34
18 Paderborn 34 7 10 17 31 65 -34 31

Indeed, the chaos around the relegation places made for gripping viewing on that last afternoon.
In the end Stuttgart completed their great escape by winning at Paderborn in a result that also relegated the hosts.
Stuttgart actually came from behind to win both their last two games – vs Hamburg and Paderborn.
But did Paderborn and Freiburg deserve to be relegated?

Position Team Shots for total Shots against total Corsi/TSR shots on target for total shots on target against total Shots on target share Shooting % For Save % PDO
5 Augsburg 458 458 0.5 150 170 0.469 28.67 74.71 103.38
1 Bayern Munich 583 257 0.694 238 95 0.715 33.61 81.05 114.66
7 Dortmund 567 288 0.663 190 112 0.629 24.73 62.5 87.23
9 Ein Frankfurt 426 430 0.498 171 195 0.467 32.75 68.21 100.96
12 FC Koln 362 463 0.439 126 161 0.439 26.97 75.16 102.13
17 Freiburg 385 515 0.428 158 200 0.441 22.79 76.5 99.29
16 Hamburg 364 494 0.424 114 189 0.376 21.92 73.55 95.47
13 Hannover 384 458 0.456 145 161 0.474 27.6 65.21 92.81
15 Hertha 297 425 0.411 107 156 0.407 33.62 66.67 100.29
8 Hoffenheim 501 453 0.525 171 157 0.521 28.65 64.96 93.61
4 Leverkusen 554 299 0.65 192 128 0.6 32.3 71.08 103.38
11 Mainz 437 482 0.475 145 175 0.453 31.04 73.15 104.19
3 M'gladbach 424 522 0.448 174 151 0.535 30.46 82.78 113.24
18 Paderborn 454 492 0.48 140 177 0.442 22.15 63.28 85.43
6 Schalke 04 418 537 0.438 153 174 0.468 27.46 77 104.47
14 Stuttgart 411 472 0.466 138 179 0.435 30.43 66.47 96.9
10 Werder Bremen 415 499 0.454 170 163 0.51 29.4 60.14 89.54
2 Wolfsburg 522 418 0.555 205 144 0.587 35.13 73.6 108.73

Well, it seems Paderborn at the very least can consider themselves unfortunate and arguably fully undeserving of relegation.
Certainly their overall shot share was a very respectable 0.48 (only ninth worst in the division).

And while their shots on target share throughout the season was less impressive, it only dropped to sixth worst.
However, the kicker is, of course, that Paderborn had the worst PDO in the league.
That mark of 85.43 was a full eight points below their nearest relegation contender (Hannover) and ten less than the next (Hamburg).
I’ve not watch much of Paderborn to suggest any of the reasons for this awful PDO.
According to WhoScored Paderborn did take the third highest percentage of shots from outside the 18 yard box (47%), and the joint fewest (along with five others) inside the six yard box (5%), and were fifth worst at taking shots from central areas (59%).


Combine that with being the equal second worst (with two others) at allowing shots from within the six yard box (8%) and eighth worst at allowing attempts from the centre (62%) and we begin to see some of their problems.
But still, Hamburg were worse in their own six yard box (9%) with Stuttgart not far behind (7%).
Either way you splice it, it seems that to me that Paderborn were at least a little lucky to go down.


A similar, though slightly weaker argument, can also be made for Freiburg who will be plying their trade in Bundesliga 2 next season too.
However, the real beneficiaries from this are Hamburg and (to a lesser extent) Hertha Berlin, who both posted some rather poor shot share numbers.
Indeed were it down to me I might have relegated Hamburg just for their 37% share of shots on target. But that was only “good” enough to earn them a second successive relegation playoff, which they duly won, beating Karlsruhe 3-2 on aggregate.

Further up the table Borussia Monchengladbach certainly rode their luck and the second highest PDO in the league to get in to the Champions League places. With rather average shot share and shots on target share numbers (certainly for a top three team) unless great strides are made with either the playing staff or tactics (or possibly both) it seems unlikely BMG will cause too much trouble in the Champions League next season.
And they could even slip back considerably in the Bundesliga.

But of course the real story of the Bundesliga season was the aforementioned adventures in Dortmund.
It’s quite remarkable that despite owning a PDO score just two points better than poor Paderborn that BVB still managed to finish seventh.
Is that the cost of one departure (Lewandowski) too many?
Perhaps more remarkably, Dortmund continued to improve their shot share and shots on target share numbers throughout the season - moving from 0.645 and 0.583 respectively in week nine to 0.663 and 0.629 by the end. Wow.
But their PDO remained stubbornly sunk well below 90. 
If Dortmund had managed to reach a PDO over 90 they surely would have easily finished in the Europa League spots. And somewhere near 100 may have even seen them recovering sufficiently to battle with Leverkusen for fourth.
That would have completed a quite remarkable turnaround from the mid-season horror show that was the Bundesliga table.

But it was not to be and Klopp’s intended fairytale ending is, while not quite a nightmare, certainly a bittersweet one.


So as we can see, from the Bundesliga season, while a shorter schedule has the advantages of generally being less demanding on players, it certainly does not help with the sample size and leaves the possibility for a greater effect on natural football variance to take effect.

Wednesday, 4 February 2015

Bundesliga Week 19: Klopp and Dortmund still can't win

So with the Bundesliga winter break over its back to the action and Borussia Dortmund are still nailed to the bottom of the table after losing at home to Augsburg.
Just rubbing that bit of salt into the wounds for Dortmund fans is Bayern's dominant position atop the table.


Position Team Played Won Drawn Lost Goals For Goals Against Goal Difference Points
1 Bayern Munich 19 14 4 1 43 9 34 46
2 Wolfsburg 19 11 5 3 38 19 19 38
3 Borussia M.Gladbach 19 9 6 4 27 16 11 33
4 Augsburg 19 11 0 8 26 22 4 33
5 Bayer Leverkusen 19 8 8 3 29 20 9 32
6 Schalke 04 19 9 4 6 30 22 8 31
7 Hoffenheim 19 7 5 7 31 30 1 26
8 Hannover 96 19 7 4 8 22 28 -6 25
9 Eintracht Frankfurt 19 6 6 7 36 39 -3 24
10 FC Cologne 19 6 5 8 19 23 -4 23
11 Werder Bremen 19 6 5 8 30 40 -10 23
12 Mainz 05 19 4 10 5 25 24 1 22
13 Hamburger SV 19 5 5 9 12 21 -9 20
14 Paderborn 19 4 7 8 21 34 -13 19
15 Freiburg 19 3 9 7 21 27 -6 18
16 VfB Stuttgart 19 4 6 9 20 33 -13 18
17 Hertha Berlin 19 5 3 11 24 38 -14 18
18 Borussia Dortmund 19 4 4 11 18 27 -9 16


I had a quick look at Dortmund's situation back in week 13 and at the time it was a case of a dominant shots team being hammered by a nightmare inducing PDO score. And the PDO problems were at both ends of the pitch - both their shooting and save percentage were around 10 points lower than the league average.
PDO is an interesting tool as it helps spot trends that are not necessarily within the team's control and is often used as a proxy for luck - 100 being the average, below = bad luck, above = good luck.
And, certainly over a large enough sample size (and in ice hockey where its been most effectively used) it regresses towards 100 over time.

Let's have a look at Dortmund's (and the rest of the leagues') stats now.


Position Team Shots for Shots vs Corsi/TSR Shots on Target for Shots on target vs SoT share Sh% Sv% PDO
4 Augsburg 249 257 0.492 87 85 0.508 29.75 74.03 103.77
5 Bayer Leverkusen 321 156 0.673 99 66 0.601 29.35 69.51 98.86
1 Bayern Munich 348 125 0.735 139 49 0.739 31.00 81.60 112.60
18 Borussia Dortmund 314 173 0.645 99 71 0.583 18.22 61.81 80.03
3 Borussia M.Gladbach 232 295 0.440 97 98 0.498 27.86 83.62 111.49
9 Eintracht Frankfurt 258 257 0.502 116 109 0.515 31.06 64.32 95.38
10 FC Cologne 179 268 0.400 68 86 0.444 27.78 73.16 100.94
15 Freiburg 203 283 0.418 84 109 0.435 25.12 75.16 100.28
13 Hamburger SV 228 257 0.471 63 93 0.402 19.14 77.47 96.61
8 Hannover 96 215 264 0.448 82 89 0.479 26.93 68.47 95.40
17 Hertha Berlin 169 249 0.405 61 97 0.386 39.47 60.78 100.26
7 Hoffenheim 270 266 0.504 95 91 0.511 32.63 66.96 99.59
12 Mainz 05 243 270 0.474 82 98 0.454 30.60 75.54 106.13
14 Paderborn 262 274 0.489 80 101 0.443 26.32 66.17 92.48
6 Schalke 04 217 298 0.421 97 94 0.507 30.96 76.65 107.61
16 VfB Stuttgart 224 276 0.449 72 100 0.421 27.70 66.83 94.54
11 Werder Bremen 230 270 0.460 99 95 0.510 30.36 57.94 88.30
2 Wolfsburg 295 219 0.574 120 80 0.600 31.75 76.19 107.94

Amazingly, Dortmund's "luck" appears to have got worse since week 13, not better.
As you'll see below, I actually had to extend my graph below its normal PDO low point to accommodate them.
(And apologies for stretching the graph in the other direction, but I thought I really should put Bayern on it this time around.)
But perhaps what is most interesting about Dortmund's situation, is they've become MORE dominant at getting shots on target since week 13. The overall shots share score (Corsi/TSR) is basically unchanged, but the SoT share has gone up by 0.03 (or 3% points). That's a really big improvement over such a short space of time and shows just how damning this PDO run is.




It is possible that some of Jurgen Klopp's tactics are playing into this problem (this is a harder state to test), but Dortmund certainly appear snake-bitten defensively, as WhoScored suggested:


I wouldn't go so far as to say calls for Klopp to go are complete madness, but from this initial analysis, it certainly seems a horrible run of misfortune at both ends of the pitch.

Usually when I have to extend for both Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund it would be for the same positive reason, in this case it is anything but.

Tuesday, 2 December 2014

Bundesliga Week 13: What's wrong with Borussia Dortmund?

A slight digression from the football league for just one post this week.

Possibly the biggest story in European football this weekend was Borussia Dortmund’s fall to bottom of the Bundesliga.
Given the team’s massive support, substantial recent success and as being one of the few real challengers to Bayern Munich over recent years, it is not surprising this has been big news.
This is even more so with Jurgen Klopp’s high profile and rumours of interest from Premier League clubs.
All of that has led to some rather strong (almost gleeful) attacks at Klopp and his reputation.

So here’s the Bundesliga table, not very pretty reading for Dortmund fans:

Position Team Played Won Drawn Lost Goals For Goals Against Goal Difference Points
1 Bayern Munich 13 10 3 0 32 3 29 33
2 Wolfsburg 13 8 2 3 25 12 13 26
3 Leverkusen 13 6 5 2 25 17 8 23
4 Augsburg 13 7 0 6 18 13 5 21
5 M'gladbach 13 5 5 3 16 10 6 20
6 Schalke 04 13 6 2 5 21 18 3 20
7 Hoffenheim 13 5 5 3 21 21 0 20
8 Hannover 13 6 1 6 13 18 -5 19
9 Ein Frankfurt 13 5 3 5 22 24 -2 18
10 Mainz 13 3 7 3 16 18 -2 16
11 Paderborn 13 4 4 5 18 22 -4 16
12 FC Koln 13 4 3 6 13 18 -5 15
13 Hertha 13 4 2 7 17 23 -6 14
14 Werder Bremen 13 3 4 6 18 26 -8 13
15 Freiburg 13 2 6 5 14 20 -6 12
16 Stuttgart 13 3 3 7 18 27 -9 12
17 Hamburg 13 3 3 7 7 17 -10 12
18 Dortmund 13 3 2 8 14 21 -7 11


But let’s have a look at the underlying stats to see if we can pick out anything that’s going wrong at Dortmund.

Can anyone spot the problem?
(Incidentally, this graph was plotted on my standard dimensions for this and so dominant have Bayern been that they don’t fit on it in EITHER direction!)






So yeah, Dortmund’s PDO is so low they barely fit on the graph. It's just brutal.
I’ve not really seen much of Dortmund this season, so can’t comment too much on whether this is a systems thing of just sheer bad luck, but it’s highly unlikely that the PDO stays THIS low for the rest of the season.
Given how dominant Dortmund are in terms of shots, Klopp's assessment that it’s pretty well governed by bad luck is fairly pragmatic, even sensible, approach to take.

Being a smaller league and shorter season though means teams are much more vulnerable to being devastated by short term slumps like this over the course of a season.
Dortmund’s title hopes are (one would imagine) pretty much shot now, but if they get a rebound of PDO as strong as the fall has been and they could yet challenge for a Champions League spot.
The rest of their underlying numbers are good enough – a sparkling shot share (Corsi/TSR) of 64.4% (third behind Bayern’s 72.7% and Leverkusen’s 69.2%) is testament to that.


The problem is that current second place team Wolfsberg are doing a pretty tidy job themselves too. If they can make up the 12 point gap on Leverkusen in third that would be a remarkable end to the season – though Klopp’s employers may just settle for avoiding relegation at the moment.


Position Team Shots for total Shots against total Corsi/TSR shots on target for total shots on target against total Shots on target share Shooting % For Save % PDO
1 Bayern Munich 240 90 0.727 99 33 0.75 32.33 90.91 123.23
2 Wolfsburg 215 143 0.601 89 53 0.627 28.08 77.36 105.44
3 Leverkusen 245 109 0.692 75 46 0.62 33.33 63.02 96.35
4 Augsburg 177 166 0.516 60 56 0.517 29.99 76.78 106.77
5 M'gladbach 163 207 0.441 63 74 0.46 25.39 86.48 111.88
6 Schalke 04 132 222 0.373 61 74 0.452 34.44 75.68 110.12
7 Hoffenheim 190 177 0.518 63 55 0.534 33.32 61.83 95.15
8 Hannover 138 174 0.443 51 53 0.491 25.48 66.03 91.5
9 Ein Frankfurt 170 176 0.491 74 82 0.474 29.72 70.73 100.46
10 Mainz 150 201 0.427 53 80 0.399 30.19 77.5 107.68
11 Paderborn 170 190 0.472 56 68 0.452 32.14 67.66 99.79
12 FC Koln 116 191 0.378 47 66 0.416 27.67 72.72 100.39
13 Hertha 132 156 0.458 48 55 0.466 35.43 58.19 93.62
14 Werder Bremen 151 199 0.431 66 60 0.524 27.26 56.67 83.93
15 Freiburg 147 173 0.459 60 67 0.472 23.33 70.16 93.48
16 Stuttgart 157 200 0.44 54 85 0.389 33.33 68.23 101.56
17 Hamburg 150 168 0.472 40 65 0.381 17.5 73.84 91.34
18 Dortmund 222 123 0.644 68 55 0.553 20.58 61.82 82.4