Sunday, 24 May 2015

League One: 2014/15 the (un)luckiest teams in the Football League

While League Two was reasonably well behaved according to shot metrics, League One, or at least the bottom half, decided to throw most of that out of the window.
If we start at the top, Bristol City locked up the title a good few weeks early but finished the season with an astronomical PDO of almost 120 – the highest in the whole of the football league.
Bristol’s shooting % and save % were both 10 percentage points above average and of course each was the highest mark in the division.

Position Team Played Won Drawn Lost Goals For Goals Against Goal Difference Points
1 Bristol City 46 29 12 5 96 38 58 99
2 Milton Keynes Dons 46 27 10 9 101 44 57 91
3 Preston 46 25 14 7 79 40 39 89
4 Swindon 46 23 10 13 76 57 19 79
5 Sheffield United 46 19 14 13 66 53 13 71
6 Chesterfield 46 19 12 15 68 55 13 69
7 Bradford 46 17 14 15 55 55 65
8 Rochdale 46 19 6 21 72 66 6 63
9 Peterboro 46 18 9 19 53 56 -3 63
10 Fleetwood Town 46 17 12 17 49 52 -3 63
11 Barnsley 46 17 11 18 62 61 1 62
12 Gillingham 46 16 14 16 65 66 -1 62
13 Doncaster 46 16 13 17 58 62 -4 61
14 Walsall 46 14 17 15 50 54 -4 59
15 Oldham 46 14 15 17 54 67 -13 57
16 Scunthorpe 46 14 14 18 62 75 -13 56
17 Coventry 46 13 16 17 49 60 -11 55
18 Port Vale 46 15 9 22 55 65 -10 54
19 Colchester 46 14 10 22 58 77 -19 52
20 Crewe 46 14 10 22 43 75 -32 52
21 Notts County 46 12 14 20 45 63 -18 50
22 Crawley Town 46 13 11 22 53 79 -26 50
23 Leyton Orient 46 12 13 21 59 69 -10 49
24 Yeovil 46 10 10 26 36 75 -39 40

The Robins had enjoyed a high PDO 115 all season but far from regressing over the closing weeks (see County, Derby) they actually increased their PDO – that’s what happens when you stick six past Bradford and eight past Walsall in two of the last four games. But the Robins were only sixth in shot share (Corsi/TSR) and fourth in shots on target share over the season – both around ten percentage points off the top team, MK Dons.
Indeed, while MK Dons are not well liked around the football league for their move away from south west London, it is hard to argue that they do not deserve promotion. Preston and Swindon (in that order) round out the top three in both the shot share categories and so it is gratifying to see that one of them will be promoted via the playoffs.

Position Team Shots for total Shots against total Corsi/TSR shots on target for total shots on target against total Shots on target share Shooting % For Save % PDO
11 Barnsley 437 506 0.463 177 222 0.444 35.03 72.52 107.55
7 Bradford 469 446 0.513 205 169 0.548 26.82 67.47 94.29
1 Bristol City 573 479 0.545 240 185 0.565 39.99 79.45 119.45
6 Chesterfield 551 419 0.568 225 192 0.54 30.22 71.36 101.58
19 Colchester 499 545 0.478 216 237 0.477 26.84 67.52 94.36
17 Coventry 484 439 0.524 180 169 0.516 27.23 64.49 91.71
22 Crawley Town 369 660 0.359 134 285 0.32 39.57 72.28 111.85
20 Crewe 356 660 0.35 171 269 0.389 25.15 72.12 97.27
13 Doncaster 537 446 0.546 225 177 0.559 25.79 64.99 90.78
10 Fleetwood Town 464 603 0.435 193 213 0.475 25.38 75.59 100.97
12 Gillingham 438 583 0.429 180 233 0.436 36.11 71.67 107.78
23 Leyton Orient 514 466 0.524 234 201 0.538 25.22 65.67 90.89
2 Milton Keynes Dons 673 366 0.648 288 151 0.656 35.07 70.88 105.95
21 Notts County 477 642 0.426 203 260 0.438 22.17 75.78 97.94
15 Oldham 459 451 0.505 182 188 0.492 29.67 64.35 94.02
9 Peterboro 503 509 0.497 206 203 0.503 25.74 72.42 98.17
18 Port Vale 476 542 0.468 193 234 0.452 28.49 72.21 100.7
3 Preston 631 404 0.61 254 150 0.629 31.1 73.33 104.43
8 Rochdale 483 469 0.507 202 201 0.501 35.65 67.18 102.83
16 Scunthorpe 476 543 0.467 204 235 0.465 30.38 68.07 98.46
5 Sheffield United 508 432 0.54 203 167 0.549 32.52 68.26 100.78
4 Swindon 590 422 0.583 255 180 0.586 29.8 68.32 98.11
14 Walsall 523 445 0.54 181 198 0.478 27.62 72.71 100.34
24 Yeovil 455 468 0.493 160 192 0.455 22.51 60.93 83.43

At the other end things got a bit uglier.
I have genuine sympathy for two of the relegated teams – Yeovil (yes, Yeovil who finished dead last by a country mile) and Leyton Orient.
Both these teams had respectable (in Orient’s case, very respectable) shot share numbers but got burned by PDO and what I can only presume is a series of horrible coinciding results.


I have genuine sympathy for two of the relegated teams – Yeovil (yes, Yeovil who finished dead last by a country mile) and Leyton Orient.
Both these teams had respectable (in Orient’s case, very respectable) shot share numbers but got burned by PDO and what I can only presume is a series of horrible coinciding results.



As PDO giveth in the form of Bristol City, PDO taketh away – in this case Yeovil suffered the worst PDO in the entire football league. (Yes worse even than Blackpool.)
So even some reasonably lower mid-table shot share numbers (Yeovil were almost dead even on shots on target share) could not save them from a horrible ending.

But the real violin lament is saved for the east London side. Orient were ninth best in both overall shot share and shots on target share.

Think about that for a minute… the ninth best team in the division got so badly burned by PDO (a whisker away from having the second worst PDO in League One) that they ended up in the second relegation spot.
The final table lies, and does it to a significant extent.


With those two unfortunate victims of luck, variance and awful coincidence taking the bottom two relegation spots, it meant the likes of Gillingham, Barnsley and (most frustratingly) Crewe all survived. Indeed, if you need another example of how powerful PDO can be, Crawley Town, the worst team in the entire football league, were a last day win away from safety.

And despite Crewe battling Crawley for that title, Notts County just couldn’t wriggle free of the relegation zone themselves and Crewe escaped.



Looking at the wider picture, it is good again to see the division as a whole taking greater effect from shot share and shots on target share than PDO – but that will be of little comfort to a handful of teams at either end of the table whose futures could have been so different.





No comments:

Post a Comment